Here’s a call we get more than we’d like: a founder or COO at a growth-stage brand, calling because they promoted their best person into a manager role six months ago, and it’s not going well. The person is struggling. The team underneath them is frustrated. And the role that person left? Still empty, now compounding the problem.
It’s one of the most expensive hiring mistakes a scaling brand can make. And the frustrating part is that it’s almost always made with good intentions.
Promoting from within isn’t wrong. Done right, it’s one of the best investments a company can make. But growth-stage consumer brands, in particular, tend to make this call based on the wrong signals at the wrong moment. This post is about how to get it right.
Not every open leadership role needs an external search. There are clear situations where promoting from within is the smarter, faster, and more culturally sound move.
Promote from within when someone has already been doing the job informally. If a senior individual contributor is already mentoring teammates, running projects autonomously, and making decisions beyond their title, the promotion is recognition of reality. That’s very different from choosing someone because they’re your best performer at their current level.
Promote from within when the step up is an evolution, not a transformation. A senior account manager growing into an account director, or a top social media manager moving into a social lead role, often makes sense. The function is familiar. The skills transfer. The learning curve is manageable.
Promote from within when the team dynamics support it. Someone the team already trusts and respects has a real head start on building authority. External hires sometimes spend their first six months just earning the room’s confidence. An internal promotion, when the person is genuinely ready, can skip that entirely.
The key question isn’t whether this person is good at their job. It’s whether they’ve shown, in any consistent way, that they want to lead people and have the disposition to do it well. Those are two very different things.
There are situations where an internal promotion, no matter how well-intentioned, won’t get you where you need to go.
Hire externally when you’re building a function from scratch. If you’re a CPG brand bringing in your first VP of Sales, or a wellness company hiring a Head of Retail for the first time, you need someone who has done this before. An internal candidate who has never built or led that function is learning on your dime, at a moment when you can least afford it.
Hire externally when you need a genuine change of approach. If a team has been operating the same way for two years and it’s not scaling, promoting from within almost always reproduces the same results. An external hire brings a different frame of reference, different instincts, and the kind of outside perspective that’s hard to develop from the inside.
Hire externally when the comp and scope of the role would require the internal candidate to grow by several levels at once. A big leap is risky for everyone. It’s unfair to the employee, destabilizing for the team, and often results in the very scenario we described at the start.
Good People Take: The test isn’t “is this person capable of growing into this?” It’s “does this role need someone who’s already there?” Growth-stage brands in particular are operating too fast for extended on-ramps. If the hire needs to be fully functional within 90 days, be honest about whether your internal candidate can actually do that.
Here’s what gets overlooked in almost every internal promotion conversation: even when the promotion is the right call, it leaves a hole.
The person you just moved up was doing a job. Now that job isn’t being done. At a growth-stage brand, that gap doesn’t sit quietly. It redistributes onto the people around it, builds resentment, and often triggers the turnover of someone you actually can’t afford to lose.
The most common mistake we see at consumer brands is treating the internal promotion as the end of the decision. It’s not. It’s the beginning of two decisions. You’re deciding who moves up and who you need to bring in.
We work with clients at exactly this moment. A founder promotes their operations lead into a COO-adjacent role. The search for their replacement is an afterthought. Three months later, they’re calling us because the ops function is in freefall and the newly promoted leader is being pulled back down to fill the gap. The promotion is undone by the lack of a backfill plan.
We spend most of our time working with wellness, clean beauty, sustainable fashion, and CPG brands that are navigating their first real scaling moment. The promote-or-hire question comes up constantly.
The pattern we see most often: a brand waits until they’re under pressure, then promotes the most visible person as the fastest path to stability. The speed of the decision is understandable. The logic usually isn’t.
The brands that get this right tend to have thought about succession before a role is open. They know who their high-potential players are, they’re having honest conversations with those people about what they want, and they have a realistic picture of what external talent looks like for any role they might eventually need to fill. That’s not a complicated system. It’s just intentional.
When you’re at the crossroads, work through these questions before you decide:
Has this person shown leadership behaviors in their current role, or are they just excellent at their individual work? Strong performance and strong leadership potential are not the same thing.
Does this role require experience this person doesn’t have? If yes, how much of a head start does that experience actually give an external hire, and can your business absorb the learning curve if the internal candidate takes the role?
Have you talked to the internal candidate about what they actually want? Some of your best individual contributors have zero interest in managing people. Assuming otherwise is a quick way to lose them entirely.
If you promote this person, do you have a clear plan for their backfill? And is that plan resourced?
If the answers push you toward an external hire, that’s not a failure. It’s clarity. And if they push you toward a promotion, the next call should be about who fills the role you’ve just opened.
Whether you’re building out a function that doesn’t exist yet, replacing a leader who’s being promoted, or trying to think through a decision before you make it, this is the work we do every day as a consumer brand recruitment agency. We specialize in growth-stage brands in wellness, beauty, CPG, and fashion, which means we understand the specific pressures you’re hiring under and the talent market you’re hiring from.
We’re not just here to execute a search. We’re here to help you make the right call first.
If you’re wrestling with the promote-or-hire question right now, reach out. The conversation is free and it might save you six months of a problem you didn’t need to create.